Due diligence evaluation of the team as a practice forces will continue to conduct due diligence for fund companies and fund. They will responsible for will be to guarantee whether or not these are suitable to the client from the point of view that fund for use.
By go including those both quantitative and qualitative performance of the fund and, what once was a little process has become a long and detail now. Analysis of fund starts with a direct line of sight qualitative the people, process, and philosophy. These elements are the source of performance serves as a backbone of any fund.
People: This item is a critical factor as the most important feature of the due diligence process. Investors want to know that who is decision maker in the fund, where they would, whether trained. System and experience of hedge fund manager is important to establish a professional insight of his / they.
Process: it tries to know that that you are getting through a process that can be demonstrated in place is manager, and that, if they have the thing investors – from the creation of ideas, through research, portfolio construction, up to the risk management is. Manager must not have not be able to tell investors that it is as it clearly states such a process briefly, suitable for repeat performance of the fund is consistent.
It is that what philosophy of the fund that, whether you are differentiated in the competition, competition it: philosophy. In order to effectively communicate the philosophy of the fund, the manager I should go focused internally on a surface that can not be lacking in the investment process. Where manager allocates a large portion of their time, where they’d like to figure out what to give professional insight of the true investor.
(Identify the) main quality factors of these three is what assembling the skeleton of the fund, comes at the beginning of the due diligence of a multi-step Amici is to undertake.